Editorial

Put the West Shore back on track

Posted 2/26/26

Imagine a Saturday morning in Highland Falls or Cornwall-on-Hudson. You walk down toward the Hudson River, coffee in hand, step onto a platform and board a train heading south to New York City or …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in
Editorial

Put the West Shore back on track

Posted

Imagine a Saturday morning in Highland Falls or Cornwall-on-Hudson. You walk down toward the Hudson River, coffee in hand, step onto a platform and board a train heading south to New York City or north to Albany. No bridge traffic. No endless idling. Just a seat by the river and a straight shot to where you need to go.

Across Orange and Rockland counties, momentum is building for a feasibility study of passenger rail service on the west side of the Hudson River. The Town of Highlands, the Town of Cornwall, the Village of Haverstraw, and both county legislatures have now adopted resolutions urging New York State to take a fresh look at the CSX West Shore Line corridor. That kind of bipartisan, multi-municipal consensus is rare—and telling.

For decades, the west side of the river has lived with what supporters call “long-standing transportation deficiencies.” While communities on the east shore benefited enormously from Metro-North investment, towns and villages from Nyack to Newburgh were left watching trains pass through without stopping. Studies came and went in the 1980s, ’90s and early 2000s, but nothing followed. The result has been congestion, limited job access and fewer choices for residents who want to live car-light or car-free.

What All Aboard Hudson Valley is asking for now is not a blank check or an overnight construction project. It is a feasibility study—one that would examine ridership, safety, infrastructure needs and economic impact. That is the bare minimum a state serious about equitable transportation planning should be willing to undertake.

Skeptics raise fair questions. Can freight and passenger rail safely coexist? Is there room along the river for additional tracks? Those questions are precisely why a study is needed. Across New York and the nation, freight and passenger trains already share corridors, often with additional tracks where space allows. The answers should be grounded in data, not fear of the unknown.

The potential payoff is enormous. A Hudson Line West serving Grand Central would complement the Port Jervis Line to Penn Station, giving Orange, Rockland and Ulster residents real choices. It would open one-seat rides to Newburgh, Kingston and Nyack, while making communities like Cornwall-on-Hudson, Haverstraw and Highland Falls more livable and more attractive to families and employers alike. Robust transit is not a luxury; it is economic infrastructure.

Local leaders are doing their part. Now the message needs to reach Albany. Gov. Kathy Hochul, Sen. James Skoufis, Assemblyman Chris Eachus and the state Department of Transportation should heed the unified voice rising from the west shore. This is not about nostalgia for the old West Shore Railroad. It is about preparing the Hudson Valley for the future.

The east side of the river shared the wealth of passenger rail for generations. The west side deserves the same opportunity. Studying passenger service along the CSX West Shore Line is not radical—it is responsible, forward-looking governance. Let’s put the idea on track and see where it can take us.